Topological Methods for the Study of Complex Geometric Structures

Authors

  • Maria Sharif Department of Mathematics, Government College University, Katchery Road 54000, Lahore Pakistan. Author
  • Khurram Shabbir Department of Mathematics, Government College University, Katchery Road 54000, Lahore Pakistan. Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Fenerbahce University, Istanbul, Turkiye. Author
  • Ayesha Saleem Department of Mathematics, Government College University, Katchery Road 54000, Lahore Pakistan. Author

Keywords:

Algebraic topology, Complex geometric structures, Homotopy theory, Fundamental groups, Homology and cohomology, Fiber bundles, Characteristic classes, Morse theory, Persistent homology, Topological data analysis

Abstract

Complex geometric structures arise naturally in manifold theory, algebraic and differential geometry, singularity theory, geometric modelling, and data-driven representations of shape. Their local metric properties alone are often insufficient to determine their global organization, since spaces with similar local geometry may exhibit fundamentally different connectivity, loop structure, higher-dimensional cycles, bundle twisting, or multiscale topological behaviour. This paper develops a unified framework for the study of such structures through five complementary families of topological methods: homotopy theory and fundamental groups, homology and cohomology, fiber bundles and characteristic classes, Morse theory, and persistent homology. The emphasis is placed on the mathematical information encoded by each method, the relationships among the associated invariants, and the circumstances in which one topological descriptor reveals structural features that remain invisible to another. Standard benchmark spaces, including spheres, tori, orientable surfaces, and complex projective spaces, are used to illustrate the comparative strength of the proposed framework. In addition, a stability-aware computational pipeline is formulated for sampled, discretized, or noisy geometric data by connecting classical topological invariants with filtered simplicial complexes and persistence diagrams. The resulting synthesis provides a systematic local-to-global perspective for analysing complex geometric structures and offers practical criteria for selecting appropriate topological tools according to the geometric, algebraic, and computational characteristics of the problem.

References

[1] A. Berglund, Characteristic classes for families of bundles, Selecta Mathematica, 28 (2022), Article 51. doi:10.1007/s00029-022-00764-4. 1, 5

[2] R. Bott and L. W. Tu, Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology, Springer, New York, 1982. 1, 4, 5

[3] J.-P. Brasselet, Characteristic classes, in Handbook of Geometry and Topology of Singularities III, Springer, 2022, pp. 303–417. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-95760-5_5. 1, 5, 9

[4] G. E. Bredon, Topology and Geometry, Springer, New York, 1993. 1, 3

[5] G. Carlsson, Topology and data, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 46 (2009), 255–308. doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-09-01249-X. 1

[6] F. Chazal, V. de Silva, and S. Oudot, Persistence stability for geometric complexes, Geometriae Dedicata, 173 (2014), 193–214. doi:10.1007/s10711-013-9937-z. 1, 7, 9

[7] F. Chazal, V. de Silva, M. Glisse, and S. Oudot, The Structure and Stability of Persistence Modules, Springer Briefs in Mathematics, Springer, 2016. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42545-0. 1, 7

[8] D. Cohen-Steiner, H. Edelsbrunner, and J. Harer, Stability of persistence diagrams, Discrete & Computational Geometry, 37 (2007), 103–120. doi:10.1007/s00454-006-1276-5. 1, 7, 9

[9] H. Edelsbrunner, D. Letscher, and A. Zomorodian, Topological persistence and simplification, Discrete & Computational Geometry, 28 (2002), 511–533. doi:10.1007/s00454-002-2885-2. 1, 7

[10] H. Edelsbrunner and J. Harer, Computational Topology: An Introduction, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2010. 1, 2

[11] R. Ghrist, Barcodes: the persistent topology of data, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 45 (2008), 61–75. doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-07-01191-3. 7

[12] A. Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002. 1, 2, 3

[13] J. M. Lee, Introduction to Topological Manifolds, 2nd ed., Springer, New York, 2011. 1

[14] J. M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed., Springer, New York, 2013. 1

[15] J. Milnor, Morse Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1963. 1, 6

[16] J. R. Munkres, Topology, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2000. 1

[17] M. Nakahara, Geometry, Topology and Physics, 2nd ed., Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, 2003. 1, 5

[18] N. Otter, M. A. Porter, U. Tillmann, P. Grindrod, and H. A. Harrington, A roadmap for the computation of persistent homology, EPJ Data Science, 6 (2017), Article 17. doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-017-0109-5. 1, 7

[19] Z. Su, X. Liu, L. Bou Hamdan, V. Maroulas, J. Wu, G. Carlsson, and G.-W. Wei, Topological data analysis and topological deep learning beyond persistent homology: a review, Artificial Intelligence Review, 59 (2026), Article 58. doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11462-w. 1, 7, 9

[20] L. Wasserman, Topological data analysis, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 5 (2018), 501–532. doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-031017-100045. 1

[21] A. Zomorodian and G. Carlsson, Computing persistent homology, Discrete & Computational Geometry, 33 (2005), 249–274. doi:10.1007/s00454-004-1146-y. 1, 7

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

Issue

Section

Regular Articles